111111 11111 111111 111111
2222222222222222 222222222222222222 22222222222222222222 22222222222222 2222222222 22222222222222222 2222222222 2222222222222222
11111111111111111111111
222222222 2222222222 222222222 2222222222222222222 22222222222 2222222222222222 222222222222 222222222 22222222222222222222222222
11111111111111111111111
2222222222222222 2222222222222222 222222222 222222222222 222222222222222 222222222222222222222 22222222 22222222 22222 22222222222
1111111111 1111111111111

 

Agrarian education and science

scientific journal

The functioning of agricultural producers in a competitive market

I. P. Chupina, doktor ekonomicheskih nauk, professor UrGAU.

In recent years there have been significant changes in the practice of the functioning of the global food market. Intense competition has led to the creation of an international organization governing the competition in this market. But the situation is such that sometimes the WTO is trying to use as a weapon in the competitive struggle of the country with a strong agricultural sector, using methods of "collective diplomacy". This contributes to the fact that the majority of export-import operations with food, is conducted by the large transnational corporations that have close ties with national governments and engaged in lobbying via national and international authorities. In Russia a few powerful vertically integrated structures, TNK international, which are unable to compete effectively. In agricultural production rather passive adaptation of farmers to changing conditions, often expressed in the curtailment of production. Developed countries, major exporters of food, now more profitable to sell with a loss of surplus production, because it minimizes their costs. Institutional transformations in the agrarian sphere of Russia has not yet received sufficient dynamism. Far from complete, land reform. While in Russia there are no objective conditions that ensure this in the first place, the total loss of agricultural production as a source of land rent in agricultural production, to ensure the normal functioning of the land market. It was revealed that the effective action of the competitive mechanism in the agricultural sector of Russia are not only institutional transformations in the sphere of ownership, it is necessary to create an appropriate institutional environment, which is expressed in unity of actions of economic, legal and social institutions of the market economy. The negative pressure of the external environment hampers the restructuring of agricultural production.

References

1. Voronin B. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie povysheniya kachestva i konkurentosposobnosti rossiyskoy selskohozyaystvennoy produktsii // Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo. 2007. # 8. S.27-31.
2. Serkov, A.F. Proizvoditelnost truda i konkurentosposobnost produktsii selskogo hozyaystva v Rossii i v drugih stranah // Ekonomika selskohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2012. # 4. S. 7-9.
3. Sokolova L.V. Adaptatsiya predpriyatiy k usloviyam rynka. Harkov: Izd – vo: FORT. 2016. 246 s.
4. Taranov P. M. Rossiyskaya agroprodovolstvennaya sistema v kontekste konkurentospo-sobnosti i prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti // Ekonomika selskohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2011. # 10. S. 20 -23.
5. Chupina I. P. Razvitie regionalnoy sistemy agroprodovolstvennoy samoobespechennosti v usloviyah konkurentnoy sredy na prodovolstvennom rynke. Ekaterinburg. Izd – vo UrGAU. 2010. 190 s.

Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "Ural State Agrarian University"

Address: 620075 Ekaterinburg, ul.Karla Libknekhta, 42,

+7 (343) 221-40-01; 371-33-63 - rectorate

+7 (343) 221-40-12 - accounting

Search